{"id":256506,"date":"2025-10-02T09:48:09","date_gmt":"2025-10-02T06:48:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.autocritica.ro\/uncategorized\/porsche-macan-5000-km-test-in-the-alps-fuel-consumption-range-costs\/"},"modified":"2025-10-04T22:39:00","modified_gmt":"2025-10-04T19:39:00","slug":"porsche-macan-5000-km-test-in-the-alps-fuel-consumption-range-costs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.autocritica.ro\/en\/eurocharge\/2025\/porsche-macan-5000-km-test-in-the-alps-fuel-consumption-range-costs\/","title":{"rendered":"Porsche Macan after 5000 km in the Alps: efficiency, range, costs"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Developed on the 800V PPE (Premium Platform Electric) architecture, the Porsche Macan impresses with up to 270 kW of charging power and an official range of up to 479 kilometers squeezed from a 95- kWh Li-Ion battery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With such figures, the German model is ideal for long journeys, a fact confirmed during the almost 5,000 kilometers covered during EUROCHARGE. In fact, on 5 of the 8 days, the actual range was even higher than the official one and exceeded 500 kilometers, thanks to the route profile and, of course, the regenerative braking system that allowed efficient energy recovery on the passes through Austria, Switzerland and Italy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Here is all the information on range and consumption recorded in real traffic, time spent at charging stations and energy costs. You’ll find them in the clear-cut infographics along with some conclusions based on the respective figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Porsche Macan: daily infographics on consumption, real range, charging costs<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Porsche Macan by the numbers:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  • Total distance traveled:<\/strong> 4637 km<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Total charging stops:<\/strong> 12 sessions on the road + 5 overnight charges<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Total time spent while charging on the road:<\/strong> 5 hours 45 minutes (345 minutes)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Total energy charged:<\/strong> 873.8 kWh, of which 304.1 kWh in hotels<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Total cost of charges (hotel charges were free):<\/strong> between \u20ac222.2 and \u20ac450<\/strong> (depending on the app used)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Fuel cost comparison (estimated per route):<\/strong>\n
      \n
    • A gasoline car of similar power (estimated average fuel consumption 12 liters\/100 km, average price \u20ac1.8\/liter) would have cost about \u20ac1,001.4.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • An equivalent diesel variant (estimated average fuel consumption 9 liters\/100 km, average price \u20ac1.75\/liter) would have cost around \u20ac730.2.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Weighted average of the energy consumption over the whole route:<\/strong> 19.3 kWh\/100 km<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    • Weighted real average range:<\/strong> 486.4 km<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

      Important mention on the driving style:<\/strong> Throughout the entire test, the car was driven in “Normal” mode, never “Eco”. It drove steadily, within the speed limits, with an approach as close as possible to the legal speed limit on each road segment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n